Legal Opinion

M/A Com-Phi v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1998No. B119418PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, J.

Avedis Sevadjian admittedly sustained electrical shock and injury while at work. The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) awarded benefits based upon the reports of the employer’s doctors, who were not provided with impeaching surveillance films. The employer contends that without such information, its doctors’ reports cannot be substantial evidence, and we agree. The employer further argues this leaves the employee without any evidence with which to award compensation. We disagree. Instead, the decision is annulled and ordered remanded to further develop the medical…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Place v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Bracken v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Tyler v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. McClune v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kuykendall v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. San Bernardino Community Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Department of Corrections v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API