Legal Opinion · Dissent

Allen v. Trimmer, County Treasurer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 17, 1914No. 4806Published

Error from District Court, Garvin County; R. McMillan, Judge. . . Action by Stephen W. Allen and others against J. F. Trimmer, Treasurer of Garvin County. Judgment for defendant and plaintiffs bring'error.

1DissentTurner, J.

I know no way to better express by dissent to the foregoing opinion that to file this, the opinion originally adopted by the court in this cause. These petitioners, plaintiffs below, are Chickasaw freedmen, and as such are each the owner of 40 acres of land in Garvin county, allotted and patented to them pursuant to Act July 1, 1902 (chapter 1362, 32 Stat. 641), and pursuant to the terms of the Curtis Act (Act June 28, 1898, 30 Stat. 507, c.- 517). Subsequent to their allotment, Congress on May 27, 1908 (35 Stat. 312, c. 199) passed an act removing restrictions from the sale and incumbrance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Choate v. TrappSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. State v. County Court of Crittenden CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1858
  3. Brooks v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Thompson v. HoltonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1855

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API