Legal Opinion

Wanken v. Allstate Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1981PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur W. Lonschein, J.

In this proceeding to confirm an arbitrator’s award pursuant to CPLR 7510 and 7514, the petitioner has moved to reargue that part of the court’s prior memorandum decision which denied petitioner’s application for counsel fees and interest from the date of the arbitrator’s award. It is petitioner’s contention that he is entitled to a counsel fee and interest under the provisions of section 675 of the Insurance Law which he says is applicable to this proceeding.

In my original determination, I pointed out that there was no statutory authority for me to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Cohn v. Royal Globe InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Citibank (New York State) N. A. v. Galor Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. In re the Arbitration between Fresh Meadows Medical Associates & Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ClacherNew York Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API