Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Moseley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1134Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 16, 2007, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment due to misconduct.

Claimant, an emergency medical technician, was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment due to misconduct—namely, falsifying work documents by forging the signatures of hospital receiving agents on two ambulance call reports. At the ensuing hearing, the employer’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MintzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of BoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re the Claim of LiposkiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Martell (Hearst Corp.--Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  2. In re the Claim of PhilipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. In re the Claim of PhilipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. MatterofPhilip[Commr.ofLabor]Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API