Legal Opinion

Ohio Public Service Co. v. Ohio Ex Rel. Fritz

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 11, 1927No. 210, 264PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReyholds

delivered the opinion of the Court..

These two writs of error were sued out at different stages of the same cause; the first while a timely application for rehearing was pending; the second after this had been denied. Under the circumstances, plaintiff in error may rely upon the latter writ and No. 210 will be dismissed.

By an action in quo warranto the State of Ohio, upon relation of the Prosecuting Attorney for Wayne County, seeks to oust plaintiff in error, a corporation under her laws, from use of the streets in the Village of Orrville. The corporation has general power to transmit and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Owensboro v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. City of Louisville v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Northern Ohio Traction & Light Co. v. Ohio Ex Rel. PontiusSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States v. Crescent Amusement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. City and County of Denver v. Denver Tramway CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  4. City of Chattanooga v. Tennessee Electric Power, Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Madden v. MaddenHawaii Supreme Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API