Legal Opinion
Rideau v. Keller Independent School District
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided March 5, 2013No. Civil Action No. 4:10-CV-926-YPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TERRY R. MEANS, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 100) filed by defendant Keller Independent School District (“the District”). After review, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part.
*680I. Background
Plaintiffs are Breggett and Terrence Rideau, individually and as next friends of T.R., their seventeen-year-old son. T.R. suffers from acute encephalopathy, a condition of the brain that renders him unable to speak, walk, or feed himself, among other things.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Mary Faye Skotak, George Jerry Skotak, and Eric Norman Skotak, Cross-Appellees v. Tenneco Resins, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- E.M. b/n/f Guerra v. San Benito Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
- A.F. v. St. Tammany Parish School BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025
- Johnson v. Crosby Elementary SchoolDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024