Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 27, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.

The appellants were tried before the Oirouit O'ourt for Dorchester County without a jury, on an indictment containing two counts — the first charging rape and the second an assault with intent to commit rape. The accused were found not guilty on the first count but guilty on the second, and were sentenced to confinement in the Maryland Penitentiary for the period of three years. There was a general demurrer to the indictment which was overruled. Under our well established practice, such a demurrer could not be sustained, if there is one good count in the indictment, even if the other is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Avirett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  2. Wheeler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  3. People v. MarrsMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. State v. AthertonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  5. State v. TarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Romans v. State of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  2. State v. MayersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. State of Oregon v. RisenOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Griswold v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Brunner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API