Legal Opinion

Copp v. 4126, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 17, 1993No. 92-0309PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The Unemployment Appeals Commission [UAC] reversed a referee’s finding that appellant Copp had been discharged without cause. It ordered that Copp’s benefits be denied. For reasons which follow, we find that the UAC erred in so ruling and reverse its order.

The UAC order quotes the referee’s findings of fact, and so we set out the referee’s findings in full:

The claimant began working for the employer as an automobile parts puller on November 20, 1990. Approximately May 1, 1991, the employer became concerned that the claimant was taking an erratic lunch break. On some days, the claimant would…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heifetz v. Dept. of Business RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. LeDew v. Unemployment Appeals Com'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Smith v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wall v. Unemployment Appeals Com'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Barreto v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API