Smith v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We reverse the order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission because the Commission erred in reversing the finding of the appeals referee. While the appeals referee determined that appellee had been terminated when the employer failed to include him on the regular employee shift assignments, the Board found that he had not been terminated then but was terminated later for cause when he failed to show up at a meeting with the employer to discuss the situation. There was substantial competent evidence to support the referee’s conclusion that appellant was terminated at the earlier date. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Citrus Central v. DetwilerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Forkey & Kirsch, PA v. UNEMPLOYMENT, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
3Cited by7 opinions
- Grossman v. Jewish Community CenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Denmark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Campeanu v. FLORIDA UNEMP. APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Ferguson v. Henry Lee Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Barreto v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.