Legal Opinion

Sacks v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 1983No. 81-3-468PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

This case presents the question of under what circumstances a government employee may be disciplined because of his public statements which are critical of the government agency for which he works. The Supreme Court of the United States, addressing this problem, has stated:

In Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 [88 S.Ct. 1731, 20 L.Ed.2d 811] (1968), we stated that a public employee does not relinquish First Amendment rights to comment on matters of public interest by virtue of government employment. We also recognized that the State’s interests…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Chalk AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. John Novosel v. Nationwide Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. Perry v. State Civil Service CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Adams v. Budd Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Lees v. West Greene School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Lee v. WojnaroskiDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API