Legal Opinion

Groene v. Boyle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1943No. 29438 and 29439PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

It is said in the case of Dillon v. Broeker, 178 N. C., 65, 100 S. E., 191, that the purpose of the Torrens Act is to secure by decree of court a title to land impregnable against attack, to make a permanent and complete record of the exact status of the title, with all liens, encumbrances and claims against it, and to protect the registered owner against all claims or demands not noted on the book for the registration of titles.

Section 8572-56, General Code, as effective until August 18, 1937, applies to these controversies. If. provided:

“When in a city * * * or county, an ordinance,,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shaker Corlett Land Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Curry v. LybargerOhio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Amrich v. BoyleOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Dillon v. . BroekerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Draper v. WilderOhio Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API