Legal Opinion

Amrich v. Boyle

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1940No. 27737PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

Upon the threshold of the consideration of this cause we are met with the age-old maxim that he who seeks equity must do equity. This cause presents a question of equitable estoppel. The Torrens Land Registration Act is not a system designed to notify the owner himself of any liens or other encumbrances. Rather it is a system for notifying third parties. It is not claimed by defendants that these special assessments may be collected from innocent purchasers of the properties or even mortgagees thereof. It is conceded that since there was no compliance with Section 8572-56, General Code, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Curry v. LybargerOhio Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Menninger v. Accredited Home Lenders (In Re Morgeson)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Shaker Corlett Land Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Bavely v. Huntington National Bank (In Re Cowan)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Groene v. BoyleOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Groene v. BoyleOhio Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API