Legal Opinion

Moccasin State Bank v. Waldron

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1928No. 6,258PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

of the court.

1. It is conceded that the controversy here is not over the crops but over the right of the plaintiff to recover a money judgment for the use and occupation of the lands described in plaintiff’s complaint.

No question has been raised as to the bona fides of the chattel mortgage executed by the Browns to Waldron. “A mortgage may be given upon a growing crop or a crop to be grown, and the lien thereof continues after severance, whether remaining in its original state or threshed or otherwise prepared for market,” but the lien attaches only to crops next maturing after the execution…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Isbell v. SletteMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Power Mercantile Co. v. Moore Mercantile Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Thompson v. FairbanksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1903
  4. Carney v. AverillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
  5. Commonwealth v. WamplerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Apartment Ass'n of L.A. Cty. Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. N Bar N Land & Livestock Co. v. TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Lane Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  4. Apartment Ass'n of L.A. Cty. Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API