Taylor v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was charged with theft as bailee. The facts show that he borrowed a diamond ring from Acton, a railroad conductor. Later he pawned it to Tuley, a bar-tender. The facts show practically two transactions. In the first, appellant borrowed $20 from Tuley, and about an hour or such a matter thereafter he borrowed an additional $80. Tuley testified in behalf of the State, that appellant at the time he borrowed the $20 on the ring, stated that he would redeem it at 7 o’clock. The particular hour appellant borrowed the money is not stated. However, it is stated…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Lucas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Eilers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Cannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
3Cited by8 opinions
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Pye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
- State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Tabb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.