Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 31, 1906No. 3462PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with theft as bailee. The facts show that he borrowed a diamond ring from Acton, a railroad conductor. Later he pawned it to Tuley, a bar-tender. The facts show practically two transactions. In the first, appellant borrowed $20 from Tuley, and about an hour or such a matter thereafter he borrowed an additional $80. Tuley testified in behalf of the State, that appellant at the time he borrowed the $20 on the ring, stated that he would redeem it at 7 o’clock. The particular hour appellant borrowed the money is not stated. However, it is stated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Lucas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  3. Eilers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Cannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Pye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. State v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Tabb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API