Science Applications International Corp. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FROEHLICH, J.*
We issued an opinion earlier in the year in this action affirming the judgment except for certain costs.* 1 Specifically, we reversed the attorney fees in full, but remanded the items designated “litigation expenses” for redetermination suggesting that “most if not all” of them would be disallowed as ordinary costs. On remand, the trial court awarded the bulk of the original items, not as ordinary costs but as “litigation expenses.”
We hold the prevailing party in this case is not entitled to litigation expenses which represent high-powered computer support akin to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Ladas v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Omaha Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Winston Square Homeowner's Ass'n v. Centex West, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Ripley v. PappadopoulosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
3Cited by23 opinions
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Bender v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Seever v. Copley Press, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Baeza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Corbett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.