State v. Hastings
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTZ, Judge.
The State appeals an order dismissing a criminal information with prejudice. The district court determined that the State had failed to comply with SCRA 1986, 5-604 (Repl.Pamp.1992), which requires criminal trials to begin within six months of the latest of several specified events. We reverse because the six-month period recommenced when the district attorney’s office notified Defendant that he was not acceptable for its preprosecution diversion (PPD) program.
I.BACKGROUND
Most of the pertinent facts are set forth in the district court’s order of dismissal. We quote from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. SisnerosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. MendozaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. EdenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. EskridgeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. AltherrNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. DavisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. MayfieldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015