Legal Opinion

Shindler v. Lamb

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1959PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenry Clay Greenberg, J.

This is an action to recover damages, for fraud and conspiracy to defraud, against six individuals, three of whom were, at the times complained of, officers and directors of Webrib Steel Corporation (herein “ Webrib ”). The damages claimed in this action are reasonable counsel fees, disbursements and expenses incurred by plaintiff to recover the sum of $164,000 paid by him to Webrib in proceedings in the United States District Court, and interest for the period of deprivation of the use thereof.

The three defendants above mentioned move to dismiss the complaint: (a) pursuant to subdivision 4…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Ritter v. RitterIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. McCreery v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Jones v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Flamm v. NobleNew York Court of Appeals · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Lybrand v. LevittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. In re the Estate of RothkoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975
  3. Tew v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
  4. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dormitory Authority-State of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  5. Donald D. Goldberg, M.D. v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API