Legal Opinion
Richardson v. United States
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided February 21, 1966No. Civ. 5102, 5395PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAILEY BROWN, District Judge.
These are actions under the Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C.A. Secs. 1346(b) and 2671 et seq.) to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by Mrs. Richardson and Mrs. Taylor. Their husbands sue only for derivative damages, and henceforth we will refer to the injured plaintiffs as “plaintiffs.” These plaintiffs were employees of a subcontractor under a prime contractor (Pace Corporation) which had a contract with the Government to produce photo flash bombs. An explosion occurred while these plaintiffs were so employed, causing the in-j uries for which they sue.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Rayonier Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Harvester Co. v. SartainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- United States v. Delora Huff Page, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of Stanley James Pageand Jenny Lynn Page, MinorsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Martha M. Kirk, an Adult, and Kenneth William Kirk, a Minor, Who Sues by His Guardian Ad Litem, Martha M. Kirk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lipka v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- New Mexico Electric Service Co. v. MontanezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Lindler v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Mickey M. Jeffries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Barbara Ellen Eutsler, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of Brian Charles Eutsler, a Minor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.