Legal Opinion

Lindler v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 23, 1974No. Nos. 73-1725 to 73-1727PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMM, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated cases concern appeals by the District of Columbia (hereinafter “the District”) from jury verdicts and judgments entered against it in district court. Although the District asserts several points of error, we are not persuaded, and therefore, affirm the judgment.

The essential facts of the case are uneontroverted. In February, 1970 the District contracted with C. F. and B., Inc. and State Construction Corporation, a joint venture (hereinafter “the contractor”), for construction of the Southeast Relief Watermain, a 66 inch diameter watermain at N Street,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Voris v. EikelSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Woolen v. Aerojet General CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. GLARRATANO v. Weitz CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  5. Welker v. Kennecott Copper CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Rowley v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Tauscher v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Phillip Hess v. Upper Mississippi Towing Corp. And Penlatex Barge Lines, Inc., Defendants- Fidelity & Casualty Co. Of New York, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Willis E. Wilson, Rep., Estate of Tomikia Wilson v. Good Humor Corporation and David A. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  5. Meiggs v. Associated Builders, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API