Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Dunn

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1886No. 11192PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in mandamus of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, denying the plaintiffs’ petition, that defendant be commanded to draw warrants in favor of plaintiffs for traveling expenses when engaged in contests about public lands between the state and the United States.

The complaint is as follows:—

“And now comes E. C. Marshall, attorney for plaintiffs herein, and respectfully moves this honorable court to issue its mandate against the defendant, J. P. Dunn, state controller, commanding him to issue his warrants against the treasury of said state, as follows: In…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stratton v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mandel v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Raymond v. ChristianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Shulansky v. MichaelsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. Proll v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. State ex rel. Journal Publishing Co. v. KenneyMontana Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API