Legal Opinion

Shultz v. Houghton

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 15, 1884No. 8390PublishedCited by 7 opinions

PPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. x ÜL Monroe, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Fenner, J.

Defendant is sued upon an account due in 1875.

His defense is a general denial and proscription of three and five years.

Evidence was offered to establish an acknowledgment of the account, for the double purpose of showing that it became an account stated, prescriptible only by ten years, and also an interruption of prescription.

For the first purpose the evidence is manifestly insufficient, since it appears from plaintiff’s own testimony that defendant never acknowledged the correctness of the account, but said he would have to look over his…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bennett-Brewer Hardware Co. v. WakemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Gibson Greeting Cards, Inc. v. CabibiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Michelin Tire Co. v. DelcourtLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. First Nat. Bank Bldg. Co. v. Dickson & DennySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  5. Hirsch v. MontgomeryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API