Bennett-Brewer Hardware Co. v. Wakeman
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
The sole inquiry here is whether the prescription of 3 years applicable to accounts may be orally interrupted. The answer to the question requires the interpretation of Act 78 of 1S88, amending and re-enacting Civ. Code, art. 3538. Prior to its amendment, the codal article read, in part, as follows:
“The following actions are prescribed by three years: * * * That on all other open accounts.
“This prescription only ceases from the time there has been an account acknowledged, a note or bond given, or an action commenced.”
The amendatory statute substituted for the words “all other open accounts”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boullt v. SarpySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
- Henry Block Co. v. PapaniaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Sleet v. SleetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- McDaniel v. LalanneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1876
- Shultz v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bartley, Incorporated v. Town of WestlakeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Hodge v. GraceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Wenk v. AnismanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- White Bros. Co. v. ShinnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
- Duncan v. RoaneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.