Legal Opinion

Carter v. Bordenkircher

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1976No. 13642PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Neely, Justice:

This appeal from a partial denial of habeas corpus relief in the Circuit Court of Cabell County presents two questions with regard to effective assistance of counsel, the first arising at the trial stage and the second arising upon appeal. While on the facts presented we find no ineffective assistance at the trial stage, we do find ineffective assistance at the appellate stage. Although we find a technical denial of constitutional rights in that petitioner did not receive a timely appeal, the effect of such denial is so speculative as to entitle the petitioner to no greater…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Gratton Earl Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. State Ex Rel. Bratcher v. CookeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State Ex Rel. Bradley v. JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. William C. Shiflett v. Commonwealth of Virginia, and C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary, James Curtis Weatherman v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent, Virginia State Penitentiary, Orillion D. James v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary, John Henry Love v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Daniel v. LegurskyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. HatfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. BushWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Rhodes v. LeveretteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. Partain v. OakleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1976

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API