Legal Opinion

Sneed v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided April 24, 1991No. 05-89-01258-CRPublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OVARD, Justice.

Ricky Renee Sneed appeals from convictions received in a single jury trial for two cases of aggravated assault on a peace officer. Finding two enhancement paragraphs to be true, the jury set punishment at life imprisonment in each case. In eight points of error, Sneed now complains of the jury charges, sufficiency of the evidence, statements made to the jury panel during voir dire, and ineffective assistance of counsel. Because we agree that the jury charges for the guilty/not-guilty phase contained error and caused egregious harm, we reverse. We hold the evidence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Alvarado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Lugo-Lugo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Lee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2000
  2. Ford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  3. Banks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  4. Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  5. Guzman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API