Legal Opinion

State v. Ward

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 10, 2005No. 51012-6-IPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*141¶1 — Russell Ward argues that the trial court erred by sentencing him for second degree felony murder based on the predicate felony of second degree assault. We agree. Therefore, we follow the holding in In re Personal Restraint of Andress,1 and vacate. In addition to finding Ward guilty of felony murder, the jury also found Ward guilty of first degree manslaughter as an alternative to felony murder. In an effort to avoid double jeopardy, the court did not enter judgment and sentence on the manslaughter charge. Ward argues that the court now has no authority to revive the first degree…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of AndressWashington Supreme Court · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. WomacWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. SchwabWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. SchwabWashington Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API