Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Buie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1994Published

1Concurrence

Green, J. P. (concurring).

We concur in the result reached by the majority. In our view, however, the 911 call does not qualify for admission as a present sense impression because the declarant was available and testified at trial. We are persuaded that the declarant must be unavailable as a witness before hearsay may be admitted as a present sense impression. The requirement of unavailability derives support from several sources. As noted by the Court of Appeals in People v Brown (80 NY2d 729), the present sense impression provision in the 1982 draft of the Proposed New York Code of Evidence…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. InadiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. People v. KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. GoodfriendNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API