Legal Opinion
Meehan v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 16, 1926No. 4460 and 4573PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
These two appeals present substantially the same question and were heard together. In the Northern District of Ohio, at Cleveland, an indictment was returned charging violation of the Anti-Trust Law (Comp. St. §§ 8820-8823, 8827-8830 and 8835m). The defendants were the American Malleable Castings Association, many firms or corporations said to be members of the association, and many individuals said to be the active managers of the corporations. One of these' individuals, Meehan, whose home and whose corporation’s place of business were in Chattanooga, Tenn., was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Pierce v. CreecySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Henry v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Beavers v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States Ex Rel. Hughes v. GaultSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Atlantic Commission Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1942
- United States v. Milk Distributors Association, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1961
- Johnson v. HotchkissCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- United States v. North American Van Lines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1962
- United States ex rel. Povlin v. HechtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.