Legal Opinion

San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. Knoepfli

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1891No. 6994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Judge,

Section A.—This suit was brought by the appellee against the appellant railway company to recover 64 acres of land belonging to plaintiff, and for damages. The land was considerably longer than it was wide, and had about thirty or thirty-five acres inclosed in a farm. Defendant in constructing its road built the roadbed lengthwise through the survey,' and appropriated for a right of way a strip 100 feet wide, or five acres of the land. The persons building the road entered the farm on the north, tore down plaintiff’s fence, and left an opening there into his farm from the 24th…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas & St. Louis R. R. Co. v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Houston, East & W. Tex. R'y Co. v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Saint Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co. v. McKinseyTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Travis Heights Improvement Ass'n v. SmallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Stephenville North & South Texas Railway Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Texas Pacific Railway Company v. SprolesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. San Antonio, U. & G. R. Co. v. BoboCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API