Legal Opinion
Carlene Henry and Everson Francis v. Uber, et al.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 22, 2026No. 2:23-cv-22053Unknown
1Opinion
Not for Publication UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CARLENE HENRY and EVERSON FRANCIS, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 23-22053 (ES) (ADS) v. OPINION UBER, et al., Defendants. SALAS, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are three motions to dismiss pro se plaintiffs Carlene Henry’s and Everson Francis’s (“Plaintiffs”) Complaint, (D.E. No. 1 (“Compl.” or “Complaint”)): (i) Defendant Geico Insurance’s (“Geico”) motion to dismiss, (D.E. No. 54 (“Geico Motion” or “Geico Mot.”)); (ii) Defendants Drive New Jersey and Progressive Insurance’s1 motion to dismiss, (D.E. No. 55 (“Drive N.J.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.