Service Employees International Union Local 1021 v. County of Mendocino
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 SERVICE EMPLOYEES Case No. 20-cv-05423-RMI INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 1021, 9 et al., ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS 10 Plaintiffs, PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 v. Re: Dkt. No. 43 12 COUNTY OF MENDOCINO, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Now pending before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended 16 Complaint. Def’s. Mot. (dkt. 34). Defendant argues that the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) 17 must be dismissed because Plaintiffs fail to state a claim upon which relief can be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.