Legal Opinion

Matz v. Farmers & Citizens Bank of Sauk City

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

In 1930, the plaintiff owned a $10,000 promissory note secured by a real-estate mortgage. Her nephew, Raymond Lueth, was a member of the firm of Fisher & Lueth, a copartnership, engaged at Sauk City in a mercantile business. Prior to the late spring of 1930, Fisher & Lueth profitably operated a small variety store. In January, 1930, one Rischmueller, another local merchant became insolvent. He was heavily indebted to the defendant bank. The bank took over the liquidation of his business, and its cashier entered into negotiations with Fisher & Lueth looking to the sale of the Rischmueller…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. National Safe Deposit, Sav. & Trust Co. of DC v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Scollans v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Benjamin v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Shepard v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Naef v. PotterIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dymarkowski v. Savage (In re Hadley)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. Matter of ZimmermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1987
  3. Broadnax v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. (In re Zimmerman)District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1987
  4. Beck v. First National Bank of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  5. In re: Robert Hadley, Jr.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API