Wilson v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.
Appellant was charged in an indictment with kidnap and rape. Trial by jury resulted in a conviction on each count. Various alleged errors are urged upon us. They will be dealt with as they are presented.
Appellant first contends there is insufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding of guilty. Appellant does not point out wherein he believes the evidence is insufficient, but contents himself with this very broad and general assertion. We believe the argument has no basis in fact. The statutes pertinent to the charges herein involved read as follows :
Burns’ Ind. Stat. Ann. § 10-2901.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Butler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
- Bush v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
- Mitchell v. ParksIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. ReimanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. RichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Emerson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Vacendak v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.