Legal Opinion

Aschenbach v. Inhabitants of Plainfield

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 22, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Porter in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lumund v. Bd. of Adjustment of the Borough of RutherfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Beirn v. MorrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  3. Stolz v. EllensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  4. Tzeses v. Bd. of Trustees of South OrangeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Marrocco v. Bd. of Adjustment of City of PassaicNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API