Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Stolz v. Ellenstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 11, 1951PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wachefeeld, J.

The Eisher brothers own contiguous properties on Hillside Avenue and Watson Avenue, Newark. The Watson Avenue property is in a zone designated in the city ordinance as a Eirst Business District. The Hillside Avenue property is located in a Third Residence District and has at the rear five garages which adjoin the Watson Avenue property.

Eor several years the Eisher brothers have- conducted on the Watson Avenue property a dry cleaning establishment in premises originally designed to accommodate a small neighborhood tailor shop. The business…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brandon v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
  2. Lumund v. Bd. of Adjustment of the Borough of RutherfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. Giordano v. City Commission of the City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  4. Ramsbotham v. Bd. of Public Works, PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  5. Aschenbach v. Inhabitants of PlainfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Medici v. BPR Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Kenwood Assocs. v. Bd. of Adj. EnglewoodNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. Reinauer Realty Corp. v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  4. Dolan v. DeCapuaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  5. Puritan-Greenfield Improvement Ass'n v. LeoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API