Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Fisher

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 17, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Pulaski chancery court. David W. Carroll, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtBattle, J.

This action was instituted in the Pulaski chancery court by Edward W. Coleman against J. W. Fisher and Dora P. Fisher to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate. At the final hearing the complaint was dismissed, and the mortgage was cancelled; and the plaintiff appealed. The appellant has filed in this court a petition by which he asks for the appointment of a receiver to take possession of the property mortgaged and rent the same during the pendency of this appeal, and to collect the rents and hold the same subject to the order of this court. Shall the petition be granted? This question…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goddard v. OrdwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Beard v. ArbuckleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Moran v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1875
  4. Brinkman v. RitzingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Adkins v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bleidt v. 555, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Barre & Montpelier Traction & Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  3. Bogard v. PowellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API