Legal Opinion

Bleidt v. 555, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 23, 1972No. 5-6123PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Motion of Architectural Products Company and Binswanger Glass Company for partial remand (in which Nabholz Construction Corporation and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company joined) is denied because movants are not parties to this appeal and because jurisdiction of the issues on the interpleader filed by Nabholz Construction Corporation is not vested in this court by the present appeal. The trial court retains jurisdiction to proceed with the disposition of those issues as if this appeal had never been taken.

John A. Fogleman, Justice. Architectural Products, Inc., and Binswanger Glass…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coleman v. FisherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
  2. Arkansas National Bank v. McIlroy Banking Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Vanderpool v. Fidelity & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Sherman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Fewell v. PickensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Alexander v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF FORT SMITHSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Nameloc, Inc. v. Jack, Lyon & Jones, P. A.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API