Kavanagh v. London Grove Township
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Court being equally divided, the order is affirmed.
ROBERTS, J., filed an Opinion in Support of Affirmance in which O’BRIEN and NIX, JJ., join. LARSEN, J., filed an Opinion in Support of Reversal in which MANDERINO, J., joins. EAGEN, C. J., would reverse and remand for further proceedings.
OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE
ROBERTS, Justice.
Today Mr. Justice Larsen declares that a township unconstitutionally exercises its police power under Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365, 45 S.Ct. 114, 71 L.Ed. 303 (1976) and Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment, 425 Pa. 43,…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Lord AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- Municipality of Monroeville v. Chambers Development Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Sunny Farms, Ltd. v. North Codorus Township & O.U.C.H, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Lambros, Inc. v. Town of Ocean Ridge, Fla.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Mahony v. Township of HamptonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- St. Margaret Memorial Hospital v. Borough Council of AspinwallCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.