Legal Opinion
Highshew v. Kushto
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1956No. 18,691PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION TO TEANSFEE
Arterburn, J.
This comes to us on a petition to transfer from the Appellate Court. We have examined the petition and it is our opinion that the transfer should be denied. However, in the opinion of the Appellate Court is found the following language:
“The refusal of the court to give appellant’s tendered instruction number 27 presents a question of first impression in Indiana. If given it would have informed the jury that in the event they found for the plaintiff any award made to him would not be subject to federal income taxes. Such an instruction has been approved by…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hall v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
- Dempsey v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Highshew v. KushtoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956
- Fardy v. MayersteinIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
- Citizens Independent Telephone Co. v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Marion Domeracki v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Psychiatric Institute of Washington v. AllenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Tenore v. Nu Car Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Michaud v. SteckinoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Richmond Gas Corporation v. ReevesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.