Legal Opinion
Fardy v. Mayerstein
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1943No. 27,825PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichman, C. J.
Appellee filed a complaint against Murdock Realty Company on two notes and to foreclose a mortgage to secure the notes, all executed by it July 19, 1932, to the First Merchants National Bank of Lafayette, trustee. An assignment of the notes and mortgage by the mortgagee to the appellee is alleged. Murdock Realty Company filed answer in three paragraphs. We are not concerned with these issues.
With the consent of the parties appellant Fardy was permitted to intervene and filed a pleading designated an intervening petition seeking to cancel the mortgage and for an accounting. It alleges,
“. . .…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- First Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. v. Murdock Realty Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Turk v. GrossmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Eppert v. LowishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
- General Ice Coal Co. v. George, Tr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
- National Mill Supply Co. v. State Ex Rel. MortonIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hinds v. McNairIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
- HINDS, ETC. v. McNAIRIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
- Highshew v. KushtoIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Kingston v. QuimbySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Smith v. BrooksNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.