Legal Opinion

Loomis v. Tulip, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 27, 1998No. C.A. 97-10334-JLTPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TAURO, Chief Judge.

This matter arises from the botched negotiation of a storage facility lease between the plaintiffs, Rodney Loomis, Loomco International, and Loomco Auctioneers (collectively, “Loomco”), and Berkeley Investments (“Berkeley”), a nonparty to the supervening action. In Count Ten of the Amended Verified Complaint, Loomis asserts a claim of tortious interference with contractual relations against Defendant Mark S. Greenfield in connection with the lease. 1 Greenfield is an attorney who has represented Defendant Duncan, Inc. (“Duncan”) at all times relevant to this case.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Swanset Development Corp. v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Roger Asay v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  3. CRIBERG v. RaymondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Bradley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Robert L. Sullivan, D.D.S., P.C. v. BirminghamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alger v. Ganick, O'Brien & SarinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  2. International Floor Crafts, Inc. v. AdamsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  3. Riverdale Mills Corp. v. Cavatorta North America, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  4. Pailes v. United States Peace CorpsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API