Legal Opinion

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Delaware & Hudson Railway Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-5354PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.

This is a diversity action, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Plaintiff, Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail), has filed a motion for partial summary judgment in the amount of $4,450,533. (plus interest at 6% since December 31, 1982) against defendant Delaware and Hudson Railway Company (D & H). Conrail seeks summary judgment on the ground that D & H failed to make timely payments as required by a Settlement Agreement (Agreement) between the parties and that D & H failed to “cure” the breach within the thirty-day grace period set forth in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Northwest'n Nat. Bk. v. Com'nw'lth.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Northwestern National Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Betz Laboratories, Inc. v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Tallarico EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. National Data Payment Systems, Inc v. Meridian Bank Corestates Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Home for Crippled Children v. Prudential InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. National Data Payment Systems, Inc. v. Meridian BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. Bank of New England Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Kingsly Compression, Inc. v. MOUNTAIN v. OIL & GAS, INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API