Legal Opinion

Kingsly Compression, Inc. v. MOUNTAIN v. OIL & GAS, INC.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 2010No. Civil Action 09-0316PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GARY L. LANCASTER, Chief Judge.

This action arises out of a lease for a natural gas compressor (the “Unit”). Plaintiff, Kingsly Compression, Inc. (“Kingsly”), alleges that defendant, Mountain V Oil & Gas, Inc. (“Mountain V”), breached the parties’ lease agreement by, inter alia, refusing to accept the Unit when Kingsly made it available (Count I). Alternatively, Kingsly brings a claim against Mountain V on a theory of promissory estoppel (Count II). Kingsly seeks to recover the payments that Mountain V allegedly owes under the lease, plus costs for insuring the Unit, and interest.

Moun…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Paramount Aviation Corporation v. Gruppo Agusta Agusta Aerospace Corporation Costruzioni Aeronautiche Giovanni, Augusta, S.P.A. Augusta, S.P.ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Brown v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clark Distribution Systems, Inc. v. ALG Direct, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Thar Process, Inc. v. Sound Wellness, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API