Legal Opinion
Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Clarence A. McKinley
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 23, 1961No. 14219_1PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge.
The parties will herein be referred to as plaintiff and defendant, respectively. Defendant, Pennsylvania Railroad Company, by this appeal seeks reversal of a judgment in favor of plaintiff, Clarence A. McKinley, entered upon a jury’s verdict in the sum of $150,000. Plaintiff was a watchman employed by the defendant at its public grade crossing at Wooster, Ohio. On March 21, 1956, one of defendant’s trains struck a moving van on said crossing. Flying debris from the van struck and seriously injured plaintiff. The action was brought under the Federal Employers’…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Henne v. BalickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
- Imperial Oil, Limited v. Frank DrlikCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Luke Bonura, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. Sea Land Service, Inc., Cross-Appellee, Atlantic & Gulfstevedores, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Francis v. Heater v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Franchina v. Providence Fire DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Rodriguez v. Senor Frog's de la Isla, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Baron Tube Company, the Partnership of Hyman Baron and Jay Baron and Hyman Baron, Individually v. The Transport Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.