RODRIGUEZ v. MAHALLY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LUIS RODRIGUEZ, : CIVIL ACTION : NO. 17-2160 Petitioner, : : v. : : LAWRENCE MAHALLY, et al. : : Respondents. : M E M O R A N D U M EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. January 20, 2021 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is pro se Petitioner Luis Rodriguez’s motion to continue the current stay of his habeas proceedings. Respondents (SCI-Dallas Superintendent Lawrence Mahally, the Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and the District Attorney of Philadelphia County) oppose the motion. Because Respondents have not demonstrated that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Toulson v. BeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.