Legal Opinion

RODRIGUEZ v. MAHALLY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 2021No. 2:17-cv-02160Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LUIS RODRIGUEZ, : CIVIL ACTION : NO. 17-2160 Petitioner, : : v. : : LAWRENCE MAHALLY, et al. : : Respondents. : M E M O R A N D U M EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. January 20, 2021 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is pro se Petitioner Luis Rodriguez’s motion to continue the current stay of his habeas proceedings. Respondents (SCI-Dallas Superintendent Lawrence Mahally, the Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and the District Attorney of Philadelphia County) oppose the motion. Because Respondents have not demonstrated that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Toulson v. BeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API