Legal Opinion

Revenue Cabinet v. Rohm & Haas Kentucky, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 20, 1996No. 95-CA-2861-MRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GUDGEL, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the Franklin Circuit Court in an appeal from the Kentucky Board of Tax Appeals (KBTA). The court adjudged that the KBTA erred by finding that certain “dock sales” of products by appellee Rohm and Haas of Kentucky, Inc. (taxpayer) to its nonresident parent, Rohm and Haas Company, Inc. (parent), which products were delivered to the parent in Kentucky and shipped to other states on trucks provided by the parent, should be assigned as Kentucky sales for purposes of determining the taxpayer’s liability for Kentucky corporate income…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Olympia Brewing Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Department of Revenue v. Parker Banana Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Lone Star Steel Co. v. DolanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Texaco, Inc. v. GroppoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Pabst Brewing Co. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Gilmour Manufacturing Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Department of Revenue, Finance & Administration Cabinet v. Roanoke Cement Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014
  5. Gilmour Manufacturing Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API