Legal Opinion

State v. Hart

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 11, 1991No. 1628PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

John Henry Hart was convicted of armed robbery and unlawful use of a weapon. During the trial, Hart sought to ex*100hibit his physical characteristics to the jury so as to point out discrepancies between his physical appearance and the physical description given by Shirley Jean Helms, the State’s main witness, to investigating officers after the robbery of the convenience store where Helms worked. Because the trial court conditioned any such exhibition on Hart’s being cross-examined, Hart refrained from exhibiting his physical characteristics to the jury. Hart appeals. We affirm.

An exhibition by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. NewtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API