Cole v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
The trial court having sustained the revocation of his driving privileges based on the conclusion that he refused to submit a breath test, appellant John Cole contends that he did not refuse but instead failed to provide an adequate second breath sample because the attending officer denied his access to the Intoxilyzer machine for a significant part of the four-minute test cycle. We affirm, concluding that appellant had a reasonable opportunity to blow into the machine.
FACTS
Appellant was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol after a Coon Rapids police…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Genia v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Huber v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Johnson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brooks v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- O'Brian v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Thushari Rangika Alahapperuma v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024