Legal Opinion

In re Craig

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 23, 2001No. 25285PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and Disciplinary Counsel have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Respondent admits misconduct and consents to disbarment. She also consents to pay restitution as described in the agreement and pay the cost of these proceedings. We accept the agreement and disbar respondent. The facts as admitted in the agreement are as follows.

I

Respondent misappropriated $62,120.34 while acting as a closing agent for a single family residential mortgage transaction. In September 1998, Standard Federal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. In Re DriggersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. In Re TrexlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mississippi Bar v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In re TrexlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. In the Matter of William Joseph CutchinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API