Legal Opinion

Yeomans v. Lysfjord

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1958No. Civ. 22723PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

This is a suit by one former partner against the other two for an accounting. The defendants, being aggrieved by an adverse judgment, have appealed. They have also appealed from the order denying their motion for a new trial. Since there is no appeal from such an order, the purported appeal therefrom must be dismissed. (Echols v. Fabyunkey, 137 Cal.App.2d 477, 478 [290 P.2d 260].)

In January, 1952, plaintiff and defendants entered into a written partnership agreement for the purpose of conducting an aecoustical tile contracting business under the fictitious name of the Aabeta Company. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Watson v. PooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Richards v. FraserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Llewelyn v. LeviCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Nuland v. PruynCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Jewel v. BoxerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Page v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Oliker v. GershunoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API