Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 9, 1951No. 17490PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Delivery of a deed conveying realty is essential to its validity. Code, § 29-101; Smith v. Smith, 202 Ga. 759 (1), (44 S. E. 2d, 486). Taking the allegations of the present petition to be true, as must be done in considering the general demurrer, the averment that the “petitioner has possession of such instrument of writing and has retained its possession since its execution” constitutes an allegation that the instrument had not been delivered.

The prima facie presumption of delivery of a deed, arising from the fact of its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hadaway v. HadawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Stinson v. DanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Carter v. WaldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fuller v. FullerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  2. Cook v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API